This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice.
Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship.
Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances.
Emily lost the original will. Not misplaced – lost. She’d carefully tucked it away in a box of old photo albums, thinking it safe, but during a recent move, the box disappeared. Now, her brother, Dax, is challenging the hastily drafted codicil she managed to piece together, claiming she lacked capacity when she signed it. Emily faces losing everything – her home, her savings, even a cherished antique piano that’s been in the family for generations. The cost of fighting this battle, even with a simple continuance, is quickly approaching $10,000 in legal fees.
As an estate planning attorney and CPA with over 35 years of experience, I’ve seen this scenario play out countless times. A lost or flawed codicil can unravel years of careful planning, leading to significant financial and emotional hardship. And while seemingly straightforward, obtaining a continuance isn’t always guaranteed. It requires a nuanced understanding of probate procedure and persuasive presentation to the court. My background as a CPA is particularly valuable here, as it allows me to accurately assess the potential tax implications of any changes to the estate plan, like step-up in basis and capital gains considerations, ensuring the best possible outcome for my clients.
What are the grounds for requesting a continuance in probate court?
The court isn’t inclined to simply grant a delay. You need a legally recognized reason. Common grounds include illness of a key witness (including yourself), unavoidable travel, or, critically, insufficient time to adequately prepare your case. “Insufficient time” is often the most successful argument, especially if you’ve recently received additional discovery – meaning documents or information from the opposing side. The key is to demonstrate diligence – that you’ve been actively working on the case but genuinely require more time to gather evidence or consult with experts. A judge will look very closely to see if you’re stalling, and repeated requests for delays will be met with skepticism.
What if I just need more time to gather documents?
This is a frequent issue. Probate courts operate on a specific timeline, and gathering necessary paperwork can be surprisingly time-consuming. The best approach is to proactively request an extension of time for discovery before the hearing date. However, if you realize you need more time closer to the hearing, you must file a formal “Request for Continuance” (Form FL-340) with the court. This form requires you to detail the reasons for the delay, specify the length of the requested continuance, and provide proof that you’ve made reasonable efforts to obtain the information. Remember, simply stating you “need more time” is insufficient. Be specific and demonstrate your diligence.
How do I properly notify the other parties of my request?
Filing the Request for Continuance is only half the battle. You have a legal duty to provide proper notice to all interested parties – meaning anyone who has a stake in the probate estate. This typically involves serving a copy of the request, along with the court’s notice of the hearing on the request, via certified mail with return receipt requested. Probate Code § 1220 dictates that if you missed a hearing because you weren’t told about it, the order may be void. A “Proof of Service” missing from the file will stop the hearing immediately. Ensure you maintain meticulous records of service – this is often a point of contention in probate litigation.
What happens at the hearing on the continuance request?
Don’t assume the judge will automatically grant your request simply because you filed the paperwork. The court will hold a hearing, and both sides will have an opportunity to present arguments. Be prepared to clearly articulate your reasons for needing the continuance, and have supporting documentation readily available. The opposing party may object, arguing that the delay will prejudice their case. You must be ready to counter their arguments and demonstrate that the requested continuance is reasonable and necessary.
- Demonstrate Diligence: Show the court you’ve been actively working on the case.
- Be Specific: Explain exactly what you need more time for.
- Provide Proof: Bring supporting documents, like medical notes or correspondence.
- Anticipate Objections: Prepare to address any concerns the opposing party may raise.
What if the judge denies my request for a continuance?
A denial of a continuance is not the end of the road, but it significantly narrows your options. Probate Code § 1043 allows you to object orally at the hearing, and the court must give you 30 days to file a written objection. However, this is a tactical decision. You will need to immediately retain counsel and prepare a strong legal argument as to why the case should be delayed. Failing to do so will likely result in an unfavorable outcome. The judge is not required to explain their reasoning, but it is crucial to understand their concerns so you can address them in your written objection.
What about the final order? Who prepares it?
It’s a common mistake to assume the judge will draft the order outlining the decision. California Rule of Court 3.1312 clearly states that the prevailing party is responsible for preparing the “Proposed Order” and lodging it with the court before the hearing. If the judge grants your petition but there is no Order in the file to sign, you leave with nothing. This can create significant delays and complications. Always submit a proposed order outlining the relief you are seeking, even if it’s just a continuance.
What determines whether a California probate estate closes smoothly or turns into litigation?

Success in probate court depends less on the size of the estate and more on the accuracy of the petition and the behavior of the fiduciary. Whether the issue is a forgotten asset, a contested creditor claim, or a disagreement among siblings, understanding the procedural triggers for court intervention is the best defense against prolonged administration.
To protect against specific family risks, review intestate succession conflicts, check for omitted heirs and pretermitted children, and be vigilant for signs of financial abuse concerns.
California probate is most manageable when authority is documented early, assets are classified correctly, and procedure is followed consistently from petition through closing. When the process is approached with realistic expectations about notice, claims, accounting, and dispute risk, the estate is more likely to move toward closure without avoidable conflict or delay.
Verified Authority on California Probate Hearings
-
Oral Objections (The “Stop” Button): California Probate Code § 1043
This is the most important statute for beneficiaries. It grants an interested person the right to appear at the hearing and object orally to the petition. Once an oral objection is made, the court generally must continue the hearing to allow time for written objections to be filed. -
Remote Appearances (Zoom/CourtCall): California Code of Civil Procedure § 367.75
Modern probate hearings are often hybrid. This code section governs the right to appear remotely. While convenient, note that the court can typically require a physical appearance for “evidentiary” hearings where witness credibility is being judged. -
Affidavits as Evidence: California Probate Code § 1022
Unlike criminal court, probate hearings rely heavily on paper. A verified petition or an affidavit is admissible as evidence in an uncontested probate hearing. This is why “clearing your notes” in writing is more important than your oral argument. -
Notice of Hearing Requirements: California Probate Code § 1220
The court’s jurisdiction depends on this. The petitioner must mail notice of the hearing at least 15 days in advance to all interested parties. If the “Proof of Service” is not filed or is defective, the judge cannot legally hold the hearing. -
Lodging the Proposed Order: California Rules of Court 3.1312
A common rookie mistake is showing up without the paperwork. The “Proposed Order” (the document the judge signs) should generally be lodged with the court before the hearing. If the judge approves your petition but has nothing to sign, your Letters cannot be issued. -
Proving the Will (Witnesses): California Probate Code § 8220
If a Will is contested, or if it is not “self-proving” (lacking a proper attestation clause), the court may require the testimony of a subscribing witness at the hearing to prove the Will is authentic.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
Corona Probate Law765 N Main St 124 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 582-3800
Corona Probate Law is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |